Wednesday, June 13, 2012
PROMETHEUS (2012)
In 1979 a horror film set in the far reaches of space, modestly called ALIEN and directed by the unknown Ridley Scott, opened in theaters and became a sensation. In 1982 Scott gave us BLADE RUNNER, securing his reputation as a visionary filmmaker. Now thirty years later he returns to the milieu that made him. This time, rather than a mining ship responding to a distress call, a team of scientists travel on the good ship Prometheus to a planet light-years from Earth where, Elizabeth Shaw (Noomi Rapace) and Charlie Holloway (Logan Marshall-Green) believe, an alien species created the human race. Mysterious tycoon Peter Weyland (Guy Pearce) has funded the trip posthumously (he’s seen in hologram) to the tune of trillions. The ship’s crew consists of no-nonsense Captain Janek (Idris Elba), an android named David (Michael Fassbender) who has uncertain loyalties, the icy Meredith Vickers (Charlize Theron) representing the interests of the dead Weyland, and several redshirts (read: alien fodder). The film begins with promise – a sacrifice on a barren planet; David preparing himself and the ship for arrival. But once the shipmates wake from their forced sleep and begin speaking lines by screenwriters Jon Spaihts and Damon Lindelof, that promise deflates like a balloon with a slow leak. Rather than evoke well-paid professionals on an astronomically expensive (not to mention important) mission, the demeanor of many of our space travelers more closely resembles that of fraternity pledges duped into a journey that, had they been sober the night before, they would have refused. So it should come as no surprise that much of the impending carnage can be attributed to stupid, reckless or self-serving behavior. Arthur Max’s production design and Dariusz Wolski’s cinematography dazzle, but the performances and story remain inert. Rapace seems miscast, Marshall-Green is annoying, Elba and Theron are underused, while Fassbender makes the only lasting impression. Too often Scott and the writers make oblique reference to seminal moments in earlier movies, so that we long to view them again and forget this disappointment as quickly as possible.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Damn, you're good. (Maybe, I've said that before...)
ReplyDeleteThis film was so stupid it made me angry. I’m glad you feel similarly. I don't know where to start with the stupid moments in this awful movie. Here's my favorite, which isn't a spoiler: A team of supposedly smart scientists having only been on an alien planet for all of six hours enter an area where the otherwise toxic air appears breathable. What does the lead scientist do? Take his helmet off. Because, as long as the air reads as breathable, there should be no need to worry about other toxins, airborne disease, parasitic creatures, radiation, acidic humidity, let alone a raft of things we might not even be able to imagine, this being an alien world and all, let alone not even knowing the source or reliability of the breathable air. And these are supposedly the smart people in the room. God, this film was stupid. And it was stupid over and over and over again.
ReplyDeleteGood review, by the way.
Eloquently put, Brian. I wish I had been sober when I agreed to see this movie (and drunk when I actually saw it). I was, frankly, insulted by how blatantly they ripped off characters, plotlines and sections of dialogue from Alien, and then couched it in a contrived creation story - didn't you just love the sweeping score? Supposedly they can't hear you scream in space, but they can hear you and the rest of the audience laughing in the theater at all the ridiculousness in this film. Alison
ReplyDeleteA cogent review as always. I can only add that I found the film to be profoundly illogical yet paradoxically predictable, i.e. the various "surprises" made no sense within the realm of averagely competent and sane human behavior (or programmable android behavior) and yet because of that, you could see the next "surprise" a mile off by just considering what's the most implausible thing that someone would do now. I've read a blog where the writer analyzes the mythological symbolism of this and that and tries to explain away the inconsistencies... he has to resort to fairly wild speculation to patch up the huge story holes (with black goo of course), and where his postulations are plausible, one has to consider that yes indeed, it's not only a stupid movie, it's a jaw-droppingly pretentious one at the same time: a dumb horror film that actually takes itself seriously. (As for the actors, I fault them not as they had nothing to work with... which only points to just how exceptional a screen presence Michael Fassbender is.)
ReplyDelete