Wednesday, August 22, 2012
THE DARK KNIGHT RISES (2012)
When last we saw Batman (Christian Bale) he had
accepted blame for Harvey Dent’s crimes, allowing Commissioner Gordon (Gary
Oldman) to use the late District Attorney’s reputation to clean up Gotham’s
streets. Today corruption seethes
beneath the city’s clean surface. Gordon
feels guilt pangs, Bruce Wayne remains recluse, and Batman has disappeared. After League of Shadows alum Bane (Tom
Hardy), a masked fascist with a cult-like following, initiates a series of
attacks, Batman comes out of retirement.
Cat burglar Selina (Anne Hathaway) steals Wayne’s fingerprints, leading
to a fiscally fatal stock trade that bankrupts Wayne Enterprises. Meanwhile Bane mines Gotham with explosives
to bring the populace to its knees. This
brutal assault leaves Batman broken at the bottom of a pit, Gordon in the
hospital, and much of the police force either trapped under the city or in
hiding. Only newly-promoted detective
Blake (Joseph Gordon-Levitt) remains free to lead a counterinsurgency. In this final film of his Batman trilogy
director Christopher Nolan (who wrote the screenplay with his brother Jonathan)
continues to explore post-9/11 themes in a thought-provoking and thrilling entertainment. THE DARK KNIGHT showed us society’s response
to chaos and terror in the guise of The Joker, while this film asks us to
ponder a choice between authority and anarchy.
In sync with Nolan’s singular vision Bale delivers another complex,
compelling performance, while regulars Michael Caine (as Wayne’s loyal butler,
Alfred) and Morgan Freeman (as Wayne’s technological guru, Fox) provide
top-notch support. Hathaway works well
as the amoral Catwoman, and Gordon-Levitt succeeds as the film’s relatable
moral compass. Marion Cotillard gets too
little screen time as Miranda, a board member who shields Wayne Enterprises
from takeover, and Hardy creates an indelible villain in spite (perhaps
because) of his hidden face. Despite its
often bleak worldview Nolan’s film ends on a hopeful note and hints at a
continuing story. Though Nolan claims
this is his last Batman film, I can’t imagine anyone but him duplicating this
impressive achievement.
Thursday, August 16, 2012
THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN (2012)
Stop me if you’ve heard this one before. Orphaned teen Peter Parker (Andrew Garfield)
lives with his Uncle Ben (Martin Sheen) and Aunt May (Sally Field). Shy, awkward Peter, both science whiz and
amateur photographer, pines for classmate Gwen Stacy (Emma Stone). During a field trip to Oscorp he meets his
late father’s former partner Dr. Curt Connors (Rhys Ifans), an amputee working
on a technology to regenerate severed limbs.
While off on an unauthorized detour, Peter stumbles across a lab
swarming with test spiders. He’s bitten
by one and soon discovers that he now has superhuman, spider-like skills, which
he enlists to humiliate the class bully and impress Gwen. After an armed robber kills Uncle Ben, Peter
designs a special suit with web-shooting apparatus and uses these skills to
track the killer while cleaning up the streets in the process. His vigilante justice brings unwanted police
attention from Captain Stacy (Denis Leary), Gwen’s father. Meanwhile Dr. Connors caves to pressure from
a shadowy benefactor and uses himself as a test subject for the regeneration
serum. His severed arm grows back, but
he suffers the unexpected side effect of turning into a giant, rampaging lizard
man. Peter will need all his skills and
courage (and the help of Gwen and her father) to stop Connor a/k/a The
Lizard. To remake the Spider-Man origin
story a mere ten years after Sam Raimi’s blockbuster (and five years after the
last SPIDER-MAN film) is a risky gambit, and one that periodically pays
off. The screenplay by James Vanderbilt
and Alvin Sargent and Steve Kloves feels less episodic than its predecessor and
has stronger character arcs. Director
Marc Webb takes a decade’s worth of special effect technology and creates a
seamless, sophisticated visual style.
Ifans makes for a sympathetic villain, while Stone gives Gwen ample
resourcefulness and courage. Garfield,
though, lacks the screen charisma of a Tobey Maguire, and his overreliance on
teen angst becomes tedious. The film’s
biggest obstacle, however, is familiarity, which, despite many improvements
over the Raimi original, this film never fully overcomes.
Thursday, August 9, 2012
MOONRISE KINGDOM (2012)
Within Wes Anderson’s tightly controlled frame
anything can happen and often does, which results in either head-scratching
perplexity (as in the first ten minutes of THE LIFE ACQUATIC WITH STEVE ZISSOU,
after which I had to abandon ship) or in giddy exhilaration (as in RUSHMORE,
his best film to date). The
writer/director’s latest effort (which he co-wrote with Roman Coppola) lands
more in the latter camp and follows two social misfits who fall in love as
completely as 12-year-olds can. In the
dog days of summer on a remote island off the eastern seaboard, Sam (Jared
Gilman) and Suzy (Kara Hayward) meet at a performance of Benjamin Britten’s
opera “Noye’s Fludde”. He’s a wayward
Khaki Scout, and she’s a Raven in the production. Both have been labeled as problem
children: she by parents Walt (Bill
Murray) and Laura (Frances McDormand); he by his foster parents (his real
parents are long gone). She spent her
summer in the confines of her family home, watching the world through
binoculars. He spent his summer
antagonizing (unwittingly) his fellow scouts while impressing Scout Master Ward
(Edward Norton) with his survival skills.
Suzy and Sam take off into the wild, which causes panic among the adults
because a large storm is due to hit the island any day. Meanwhile sad sack Captain Sharp (Bruce
Willis) forms a search party to track down the wayward youths. Anderson presents childhood as we remember it
– filled with high adventure, chaste romance, and selfless heroics. He contrasts this with the melancholy
grown-ups who seem worn down by the cares of adult life. We understand why Sam and Suzy seek to escape
the adulthood set before them, and we suspect that those who label them troubled
do so because they can’t bear this reminder of their lost idealism. The performances are uniformly
excellent. Hayward and Gilman are
winning and charmingly idiosyncratic, while a vulnerable Willis and a guileless
Norton are an unexpected treat. Anderson
is often criticized for his detached tone, but he transcends this here with a
final shot that positively glows with warm affection.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)